May 30th, 2009 (10:44 pm)
emotions?: contemplative
euphonity : The Montagues and the Capulets - Prokefiev
Again, today, I met two people I feel strangely towards. The unique characteristics that present themselves, I have not observed else where, yet they are so very charming. So charming, but I am restricted in my contact by ordinary but insurmountable means. Furthering my confusion, I am not particularly sure why I even like Bi De. He is not intellectually adroit I am sure, and therefore it must be that he represents the faction of social action I try so desperately to distance myself from. He asked me whether or not I had a Facebook and of course I smiled gently and affirmed the negative. Such social rituals are so far from the main goal of evolution, but the sickening thing about evolution… only those that had the will to survive among favorable adaptation succeeded in passing along their genes. And today, all things living generally contain that will; it was not through artificial selection that the will was created, and thus it must be natural. But the thing that strikes me with such dissonance, at different, and perhaps all, periods of time for some, the apex of existence was not to reproduce but whatever it was that took precedence led to the failure of succession and thus the failed continuation of any other desires. And now I cannot help but think that the ingrained want of reproduction is unnatural, alternatives presented themselves but by the mere nature of life they were not passed along. The furthering of humanity cannot manifest because all things we do are made, consciously or not, for success in reproduction. Obviously, there exist today many people, but certainly not a majority, without such a drive, through a “malfunction” in their genetics or perhaps social circumstances, but they will more than likely not be contributing to the succeeding generation and the continuation of the variance. Now that I think about it though, unnatural is not quite the right word for this in the sense that its antonym would be natural. The point is a change of aspirations not reflected by the ancestral brain, aspirations created by the relatively new ability of introspection, aspirations regarding the height of humanity meaning something beyond the continuation of our species. Bi De, I think represents both the need for social connections developed by evolution and the alternative aspirations nature perpetually tries to abandon, and all without a hint of academic persuasion.
By comparison, my reason for liking Mo Yu is quite simple. Aesthetics. He is demure, and as Swann says of Odette, he quirks his fingers just so and it reminds me terribly of the tension and life in Baroque art. Such unintentional languid grace…
Anyway, I have almost finished my study of Joyce thanks to the concert call-time being so many hours off.